question

Oct. 9th, 2004 01:10 am
fileg: (Default)
[personal profile] fileg
--we can't destroy life to protect life --

so, stem cells, no.

Excuse me? War?

Date: 2004-10-09 12:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kelex.livejournal.com
What makes me uneasy, however, is the *creation* of embryos in a lab specifically for the purpose of creating and harvesting stem cells.

From the National Institute of Health's (and yikes, sorry, the caps are theirs, not mine, on the document that I copied from...)

"NOTICE OF CRITERIA FOR FEDERAL FUNDING OF RESEARCH ON EXISTING HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELLS AND ESTABLISHMENT OF NIH HUMAN EMBRYONIC STEM CELL REGISTRY" found at http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-02-005.html

On August 9, 2001, at 9:00 p.m. EDT, the President announced his decision to allow Federal funds to be used for research on existing human embryonic stem cell lines as long as prior to his announcement (1) the derivation process (which commences with the removal of the inner cell mass from the blastocyst) had already been initiated and (2) the embryo from which the stem cell line was derived no longer had the possibility of development as a human being.

In addition, the President established the following criteria that must be met:

o The stem cells must have been derived from an embryo that was created for reproductive purposes;
o The embryo was no longer needed for these purposes;
o Informed consent must have been obtained for the donation of the embryo;
o No financial inducements were provided for donation of the embryo.


So, at least in the US, there are no creations of embryos in the labs for harvesting purposes; I don't even think they're allowed to clone the cells after they've been removed, which would allow them to stop relying *on* embryos quite so much, but one step at a time.

Date: 2004-10-09 02:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] undonne.livejournal.com
So, at least in the US, there are no creations of embryos in the labs for harvesting purposes; I don't even think they're allowed to clone the cells after they've been removed, which would allow them to stop relying *on* embryos quite so much, but one step at a time.

You're absolutely right -- that's the compromise, at least for the present. My understanding is that the first human cloning (with subsequent stem cell removal) was done in North Korea early this year. There are a bunch of different bills in different stages in Congress right now -- some would ban cloning for both reproductive and therapeutic purposes, some do this and would also ban any therapies derived from cloning in other countries to come into the U.S., some would allow cloning of embryos for thereaputic stem cell research.

Profile

fileg: (Default)
fileg

March 2012

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
1112 13141516 17
181920212223 24
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 21st, 2025 01:41 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios