fileg: (Default)
fileg ([personal profile] fileg) wrote2004-10-09 01:10 am

question

--we can't destroy life to protect life --

so, stem cells, no.

Excuse me? War?

[identity profile] fileg.livejournal.com 2004-10-09 01:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Missed saying this:
What makes me uneasy, however, is the *creation* of embryos in a lab specifically for the purpose of creating and harvesting stem cells

what makes me uneasy is the creating of all those embryos for implantation.

I am not at all convinced that our overpopulated planet need us to spend millions of dollars helping people breed. That flies in the face of fate/nature/god to me.

And I am completely appalled that in this country no one ever speaks up against making all these *disposable* embryos. Just against using the ones that were going to be destroyed.

So, while I may not know for sure which side I'm on, I'm not on the fence. If one of these things is wrong, then they both are.

[identity profile] undonne.livejournal.com 2004-10-09 02:55 pm (UTC)(link)
I am not at all convinced that our overpopulated planet need us to spend millions of dollars helping people breed. That flies in the face of fate/nature/god to me.

And I am completely appalled that in this country no one ever speaks up against making all these *disposable* embryos. Just against using the ones that were going to be destroyed.


That's one reason I really respect the position of the Catholic church in this area -- on grounds of natural law and respect for life, they opposed in vitro from the beginning, they oppose capital punishment, they oppose euthanasia, etc. It is, at least, a coherent position.